I had absolutely no idea that
/dev/random was so controversial
> That's all good and nice, but even the man page for /dev/(u)random contradicts you! Does anyonewho knows about this stuff actually agree with you?
No, it really doesn't. It seems to imply that /dev/urandom is insecure for cryptographic use, unless you really understand all that cryptographic jargon.
From Myths about /dev/urandom